Norsk versjon
THE ???? DATABASE
Deposit 0 - 000 FEIL
(Object Id: )
(Last updated: 17.10.2017)
Drill Cores: Engebøfjellet
Location
County: Municipality: Mangler ()
Map 1:50000: Dale (1117-1) Map 1:250000: Florø (tidl. Måløy)
Coordinate system: UTM-Zone 33 - EUREF89/WGS84
East: 310201 m. North: 6822750 m.
Longitude: 5.4342980 Latitude: 61.4917060
Show on map
Resource
Resource Type: Ferrous metals(Fe, Mn, Ti) Resource Subtype: Titanium
Element(s): Ti Rutile
Importance
Raw material meaning: International Importance (reg. 11.05.2015)

Resources and production
Activity: Exploration Reserves: 154000 thousand tons
Operating method: Historical production:


Products
Element/product Crude ore grade or quality Reg. date
TiO2 3.77 % 05.01.2001

Operations
From - To Activity Comments
1995 - 1997 Test beneficiation Company/Institution :DuPont
Various beneficiation tests were done by DuPont in USA. The results are summarised by CIBM World Markets in their "Engebøfjellet Rutile Project Norway".
1995 - 1997 Core drilling Company/Institution :DuPont and Norske Conoco
1995-96: 5000 m drilled by NGU. 1997: 10000 m drilled by Geodrilling. The cores are stored at NGUs core storage at Løkken. Detailed core information is available from NGU on request.

Mineralization
Era: Paleozoic Period: Devonian
Genesis: Metamorphic formation Form: Lens
Main texture: Foliated Min. distribution: Disseminated (<20 % ore minerals)
Main grain size: Fine grained (< 1 mm) Main alteration: Amphibolisation
Strike/Dip: 250 / 80 Direction:
Plunge:
Ti-deposit type(s)
Main type: Metamorphic Ilm/Mt-ratio:
Sub type: Rutile in eclogite %TiO(Ore):
Titanium province: Sunnfjord %P2O5(Ore):
Host rock: Eclogite %MgO(Ilm):
Main Ti mineral: Rutile %V2O3(Mt):
ppm U (Rutile):
Stratigraphic classification of host rock
Era: Proterozoic Period: Mesoproterozoic
Province: Caledonian Basement Province
Geotec.unit: Western Gneiss Region
Tectonic complex: Hegreneset Complex
Igneous complex:
Group: Formation:

Mineralogy
Relationship Mineral Amount
Gangue mineral Pyroxene Major mineral (>10%)
Gangue mineral Amphibole Major mineral (>10%)
Gangue mineral Garnet Major mineral (>10%)
Gangue mineral Quartz Subordinate mineral (1-10%)
Ore mineral Rutile Major mineral (>10%)

Lithology:
Relationship Rock Origin
Host rock Eclogite Intrusive
Original rock :Gabbro
Metamorphic facies :Eclogite
Wall rock Amphibolite Intrusive
Metamorphic facies :Amphibolite
Wall rock Banded gneiss Extrusive
Original rock :Tuff
Metamorphic facies :Amphibolite

Information(s) in free text format
Free text
The Engebøfjellet rutile deposit is a 2.5 km long E/W-trending hill on the northern side of the Førdefjord between the communities Engebø and Vevring. The deposit is approximately 300 m wide in the central part; with the highest point 320 m.a.s.l. The western part of the deposit continues beneath sea level while it runs "up into the air" in the east. The deposit is believed to represent a 1500 Ma Ti-rich Proterozoic gabbro intrusion within volcano-sedimentary rocks that was metamorphosed to eclogite during Caledonian high-pressure metamorphism at 400 Ma. In the eclogitization process the gabbroic mineral assemblage were replaced by an eclogite mineral assemblage with the main minerals garnet, omphacitic clinopyroxene and an actinolitic to barroisitic amphibole, and ilmenite was replaced by rutile. See Korneliussen et al. (1998), Kleppe (2013) and Erambert & Braathen (2014) for detailed geological information. Engebøfjellet was originally identified as a rutil-rich eclogite with an economic potential by chief geologist Hans-Peter Geis from the company Elkem around 1975. It was thereafter reconnaissancely samples by NGU as a part of a collaboration project between NGU, Elkem and S&F County in 1978-89 (Korneliussen 1978, 1980). The American company DuPont was in the 1990'ies actively searching for rutile deposits worldwide, with a particular interest in rutile with a low content of uranium, such as rutile from eclogite rocks. The Sunnfjord region in W Norway was identifies to be of particular interest due to a large amount of eclogite, some of which had rutile grades (more than 2.5 % rutile) of economic interest. Engebøfjellet was identified as the most attractive of several deposit in the region. DuPont and the oil company Conoco Norway (at that time owned by DuPont) made an agreement with a local company FjordBlokk, and during from 1995 to 1997 49 boreholes were drilled, altogether c. 15.000 meters. Ca 400 million tons of eclogite with 2.5-4.5 % TiO2 was identified, with more than 90 % of the TiO2 as rutile. The cores are stored at NGUs core storage at Løkken. The DuPont project was closed down at the end of 1997. The mineral rights (at that time utmål) stayed with Conoco, and were in 2006 sold to the company Nordic Mining ASA that continued the development of the project. A crucial issue is mine waste deposition, and after a 5-6 year long process the company received (April 2015) permission for deposition of waste mineral materials from the mineral processing into the fjord at c. 300 m depth. The continued process towards mining operation is expected to take 4-5 years, and a mine may then be operative from 2020. DuPont planned a production of 200.000 t/y rutile concentrate (rutile recovery 40 %) based on large-scale open-pit mining of c. 10 Mt/y ore. The Nordic Mining alternative is smaller, 80.000 t/y rutile concentrate (recovery 50 %) based on the mining of 4 Mt/y of ore; firstly the ore is to be mined from an open pit in the central part of the deposit, then the mining is to be continued underground after some years; see www.nordicmining.com. The Nordic Mining resource estimate is 150 mill. tons of mineable rutile ore while the DuPont estimate is 380 mill. tons. There are two main reasons for the large difference in these resource numbers: Firstly, DuPont planned to mine more-or-less the entire deposit in a low-cost per ton operation, while the more complex Nordic Mining alternative is going to leaves a fairly large portion of the western part of the deposit untouched. Secondly, there is a significant different in cut-off; DuPont planned for a cut-off of 2.5 % TiO2 compared to Nordic Mining's 3.0 % TiO2. The mineral processing is challenging since the rutile concentrate must meet tough market criteria on both chemical purity and grain-size.

Photo(s) from the Deposit area:
Photo no. 1 showing Engebøfjellet topo map"

Bibliography:
From NGU's Reference Archive:
Grimstvedt, Andreas; Korneliussen, Are , 2000
Bruk av XRD i kvantitative mineralbestemmelser-Eksempel Engebøfjellet
;Norges geologiske undersøkelse;FAGRAPPORT;NGU-rapport; No.2000.061;43 pages
Abstract:
Mange mineralforekomster er påvirket av sekundære, ofte uønskede, metamorfe prosesser. Ofte vil det være ønskelig å kartlegge utbredelsen av slike mineralogiske variasjoner i forekomsten, enten fordi disse kan ha stor innvirkning på bergartens/malmens oppredningsegenskaper og dermed påvirker utvinningsgraden, eller at det forårsaker kvalitetsvariasjoner i mineral- produktet. I slike tilfeller vil det være viktig for bedriften å ha god oversikt over de mineralogiske variasjoner i forekomsten. XRD har betydelig anvendelsespotensiale for undersøkelse av kvantitative såvel som kvalitative mineralogiske variasjoner i en mineralforekomst, særlig gjelder dette variasjoner som er vanskelige å kartlegge med tradisjonelle metoder. Metodens store fortrinn er: (1) Den er ekstrem følsom for mineralogiske variasjoner i en prøveserie. (2) Den kan anvendes på et prøvemateriale som i utgangspunktet kan ha en hvilken som helst størrelse, forutsatt at den pulverprøven som analyseres er et representativt utsplitt fra originalprøven. Dette betyr at en for eksempel kan benytte kjerneprøver av en hvilken som helst størrelse som knuses og splittes ned til en representativ, hensiktsmessig underprøve for selve analysen. Denne rapporten er en dokumentasjon av egnetheten av XRD til kvantitative mineralberstemmelser, hvor en har benyttet prøvemateriale fra Engebøfjellet rutil/eklogitt-forekomst i Sogn og Fjordane. Det teoretiske grunnlaget og utarbeidelse av kalibreringskurver på basis av mineralstandarder blir detaljert beskrevet, og det dolumenteres at nøyaktigheten i bestemmelsen er relativt bra forutsatt at en benytter egnede mineralstandarder.

Korneliussen, A.; Ahrenberg, E.; Furuhaug, L.; Garson, M.; Staw, J.; Fossflaten, G. , 1996
Core-drilling at Engebøfjellet 1995-96; Dhl to Dh5
;Norges geologiske undersøkelse;FAGRAPPORT;NGU-rapport; No.96.062;155 pages
Abstract:
Based on an agreement between Fjord Blokk and Conoco/DuPont a series of drill- holes have been done on the Engebøfjellet rutile-bearing eclogite on the northern side of Førdefjord. The purpose of the project is to investigate and evaluate the rutile resource at Engebøfjellet. The project has been supported by Prospekteringsfondet. This report, which summariezes the results of the first 1000 m of drilling, is preliminary, primarily for Prospekterings- fondet. When the drilling program is finished, at approx. 2200m, all drilling results will be reported together in a comprehensive report. The eclogite is a 2 km long and up to 500 m wide lens-formed eclogite body surrounded by Proterozoic granitoid gneisses. Three major rock types have been distinguished within the deposit. The margins of the eclogite body are dominated by an amphibolitic unit containing amphibolite, amphibolitic eclogite and numerous gneiss bands and interactions. The central parts of the deposit contains a leucogabbroic eclogite unit and a massive Ti-rich eclogite which is the target rock for the rutile investigations. To date (May 1996) 8 drill-holes have been drilled; of these Dh1,2,3,4 and 5 are included in this report.

Mauring, Eirik; Gellein, Jomar , 1996
Interpretation of a gravity profile across the Engebøfjellet rutile-bearing eclogite deposit
;Norges geologiske undersøkelse;FAGRAPPORT;NGU-rapport; No.96.061;14 pages
Abstract:
As a part of a collaborative project with DuPont, NGU has made gravity measure- ments across the eastern part of the Engebøfjellet rutile-bearing eclogite deposit in Fjaler commune, Sogn and Fjordane county. The main objective of the investigations was to delineate the morphology and subsurface extension of the eclogite body through gravity modelling. Gravity measurements were made at 39 stations along one 775 m long profile. Two alternative models are proposed in the interpretation of the gravity data. The first model (model 1) has one eclogite body with a density of 3400 kg/m3 and a dip 70-75° towards north-north-west. The length along the dip is on the order of 350-400 m. The average width (horizontal cross section) of the body is c.90 m, and it seems to become thicker towards the surface. The length of the modelled eclogite in the strike direction is set to 1200 m (although the eclogite is longer and wider towards west, but this has little or no effect on the calculated model response). With the dimensions given above, the total volume of the modelled body is c.40.10/6 m3 equivalent to a mass of c. 136 Mt. Model 2 was constructed to get a better match between the calculated model response and the observed Bouguer anomaly values for some stations. An additional body had to be added to the south and in the close vicinity of the main eclogite body to get a better match. However, it was found that the stations in question suffered from erroneous or insufficient terrain corrections due to severe topography, and that these stations should be taken into little or no account in the modelling. The introduction of the additional body in model 2 thus seemed unlikely.

Korneliussen, A.; Braathen, A.; Erambert, M.; Lutro, O.; Ragnhildstveit, J. , 1998
The geology of the Engebøfjell eclogite deposit and its regional setting
;Norges geologiske undersøkelse;FAGRAPPORT;NGU-rapport; No.98.081;121 pages
Abstract:
Fortrolig til 04.05.2003. The Engebøfjellet eclogite deposit is situated at the northern side of Førde- fjord near the small community Vevring in Naustdal kommune, Sogn og Fjordane county, W.Norway. Geologically the Førdefjord area belongs to the "Western Gneiss Region", between the Devonian Kvamshesten basin to the south and the Devonian Håsteinen basin to the North. Recent mapping divide the Førdefjord region into two major geologic units: the Hegreneset complex and the Helle complex. The Hegreneset complex (oldest) contains a variety of amphibolite, eclogite and gabbroic rocks, together with tonalitic to dioritic gneisses. The Helle complex comprises mainly granitic and granodioritic gneisses.

Korneliussen, Are; Erambert, Muriel , 1997
Core-drilling at the Engebøfjell rutile-bearing eclogite 1995-96. Summary report
;Norges geologiske undersøkelse;FAGRAPPORT;NGU-rapport; No.97.014;141 pages
Abstract:
Engebøfjellet is situated on the northern side of Førdefjord within an area characterized by a series of Proterozoic felsic and mafic rocks heavily affected by Caledonian deformation and metamorphism. During the Caledonian high-pressure metamorphism Proterozoic mafic rocks were transformed into eclogites. In this transformation ilmenite was replaced by rutile. The protolith to the Engebøfjell eclogite is believed to be a layered, Ti-rich, Proterozoic gabbroic complex; it now has the form of a highly irregular, east- west trending, 2.5 km long and up to 0.5 km broad lens dipping steeply to the north. It consists of two major eclogite varieties; a leucogabbroic eclogite with low Ti-and Fe-content, and a ferrogabbroic, Ti-and Fe-rich eclogite. This ferrogabbroic eclogite is the rutile ore that has been the focus of the rutile exploration work at Engebøfjellet. In the period October 1995 to June 1996 ten reconnaissance bore-holes were drilled to investigate the character of the Engebøfjell ferrogabbroic eclogite at depth; altogether 2340 meters of core were recovered. This report gives a summary of these drilling results with analytical data and mineralogical descriptions.

Mauring, Eirik; Gellein, Jomar; Korneliussen, Are , 1997
Interpretation of two gravity profiles across the Engebøfjellet rutile-bearing eclogite deposit
;Norges geologiske undersøkelse;FAGRAPPORT;NGU-rapport; No.97.002;21 pages
Abstract:
Confidential to 31.12 2002. Gravity measurements have been carried out along two profiles across the Engebøfjellet rutile-bearing eclogite deposit. The main objective of the investigations was to delineate the morphology and subsurface extension of the eclogite body, given results and constraints from surface mapping and drillholes. Two alternative models are proposed for both profiles. The volume and mass estimates for the models given must be mistaken for the total volume and mass of the whole eclogite deposit, which is larger. This is because the eclogite deposit extends to the east at a longer distance thean would affect the calculated reponse.

Mauring, Eirik; Gellein, Jomar , 1997
Interpretation of gravity profiles at the Engebøfjellet rutile-bearing eclogite deposit
;Norges geologiske undersøkelse;FAGRAPPORT;NGU-rapport; No.97.173;29 pages
Abstract:
Fortrolig til 31.12.2003 Gravity measurements have been carried out along four profiles to the east and west of the Engebøfjellet rutile-bearing eclogite deposit. The main objective of the gravity measurements was to delineate possible heavy (ore-type eclogite) bodies at depth to the west and the east of the known, exposed eclogite deposit.

Korneliussen, A.; Furuhaug, L. , 1991
Fureviknipa og Engebøfjellet rutilforekomster ved Førdefjorden, Sogn og Fjordane.
;Norges geologiske undersøkelse;FAGRAPPORT;NGU-rapport; No.91.171;17 pages
Abstract:
I Førdefjordområdet opptrer en rekke forekomster av relativt rutilrike eklogittbergarter. I 1990 ble det utført ny prøvetaking av to av disse forekomstenee, Furuviknipa i Førde kommune og Engebøfjellet i Naustdal kommune. Begge forekomstene inneholder relativt store partier med i størrelsesorden 3 % rutil. Med utgangspunkt i at det kreves en rutilgehalt på omtrent 5 % over en forekomststørrelse på 10-15 mill. tonn for å kunne gi grunnlag for økonomisk utnyttelse, vurderes disse forekomster å ikke være drivbare på rutil.

Korneliussen, Are , 1978
Rutil i eklogitter, Sunnfjord.
;Norges geologiske undersøkelse;FAGRAPPORT;NGU-rapport; No.1717/1;24 pages
Abstract:
Som ledd i et samarbeide mellom NGU og Elkem Spigerverket om undersøkelser av jern- og titan-forekomster på Vestlandet ble det sommeren 1978 utført endel rekognoserende undersøkelser med henblikk på rutilforekomster i Sunn- fjord. De aktuelle områder består av prekambriske gneiser med innslag av gabbroide, amfibolittiske, eklogittiske, ultramafiske og granittiske berg- arter. Rutilforekomstene er tilknyttet eklogitt og granat-amfibolitt. Enkelte av de rutilførende bergartskropper og -soner er i km-størrelse. Analyser viser at økonomisk interessante titangehalter forekommer (over 5% TiO2) og forekomst-typen vurderes av den grunn som lovende.

Korneliussen, Are , 1980
Tunge bergarter, Sunnfjord.
;Norges geologiske undersøkelse;FAGRAPPORT;NGU-rapport; No.1717/2;7 pages
Abstract:
Forholdsvis tunge eklogitt-amfibolittiske og granat-amfibolittiske bergarter (sp.v. 3.2-3.6) i Sunnfjord kan tenkes anvendt til formål hvor det kreves høy egenvekt for råstoffmaterialet, f.eks. som ballastmateriale og til havnebyggingsformål. Denne rapport gir en generell oversikt over enkelte forekomster av slike bergarter ved Førdefjorden og Dalsfjorden. Egenvekt i forhold til bergartstype og forekomstlokalitet framgår. Vurder- inger av homogenitet og brytningstekniske forhold er ikke utført.

Korneliussen, Are , 1980
Jern- og titan-forekomster tilknyttet gabbroide, amfibolittiske og eklogittiske bergarter i Sunnfjord, Sogn og Fjordane.
;Norges geologiske undersøkelse;FAGRAPPORT;NGU-rapport; No.1717/3;39 pages
Abstract:
I forbindelse med gabbroide, granat-amfibolittiske og eklogitt-amfibolittiske bergarter innen prekambriske kvarts-feltspatiske gneiser i Sunnfjord, opptrer forekomster av magnetitt/ilmenitt og rutil/ilmenitt. Magnetitt (V-holdig)/ilmenitt opptrer som disseminasjon i gabbro, og som disseminasjon og massivmalm i klorittiserte partier i granat- og eklogitt- amfibolitt. De respektive forekomster er enten små eller lavgehaltige og vurderes som mindre lovende. Rutil opptrer som disseminasjon sammen med ilmenitt i granat- og eklogitt- amfibolitt og er et økonomisk sett adskillig mer attraktivt mineral. Det er påvist forekomster av betydelig størrelse, men med forholdsvis lave gjennom- snittsgehalter (2-3% TiO2, hovedsakelig som rutil). Enkelte partier innen disse forekomster inneholder imidlertid rutilgehalter av økonomisk interessant størrelsesorden (minst 4-5% rutil), men de korresponderende forekomststørr- elser og gjennomsnittsgehalter er ukjent. Det gjenstår å foreta en detaljert prøvetaking og vurdering av de mest interessante mineraliseringer.

Korneliussen, Are , 2001
Rutilressurser i Sunnfjord-regionen, Sogn og Fjordane
;Norges geologiske undersøkelse;FAGRAPPORT;NGU-rapport; No.2001.102;27 pages
Abstract:
Rutil/eclogitt-forekomster i Sunnfjord representerer en "ny" type rutil- forekomst som kan få stor økonomisk betydning i framtiden. Den mest kjente av forekomstene er Engebøfjellet på nordsiden av Førdefjorden i Naustdal kommune; den var gjenstand for omfattende undersøkelser i 1995-97 i regi av det amerikanske indiustriselskapet DuPont og det da DuPont-eide oljeselskapet Norske Conoco. Disse undersølelser resulterte i påvisning av en ressurs på 400 millioner tonn rutilmalm til en in situ verdi på i størrelsesorden 60 MRDkr Engebøfjell-prosjektet stoppet opp ved årsskiftet 1997/98 som en konsekvens av endringer i DuPonts overordnede strategi. Det er i fagmiljøet akseptert at Engebøfjellet og andre forekomster i regionen representerer en mineralressurs av stor nasjonal og internasjonal betydning. Formålet med denne rapporten er å oppsumere hovedtrekkene vedrørende rutil/ eklogitt-forekomstene i Sunnfjord, og derigjennom stimulere til en fornyet interesse for ressursen.

Korneliussen, Are ; McLimans, Roger ; Braathen, Alvar ; Erambert, Muriel ; Lutro, Ole ; Ragnhildstveit, Jomar , 2000
Rutile in eclogites as a mineral resource in the Sunnfjord Region, Western Norway.
;Norges geologiske undersøkelse;TIDSSKRIFTARTIKKEL;NGU Bulletin; No.436;39-47 pages
Abstract:
The world's resources of the primary titanium raw materials ilmenite and rutile are very large. However, there is a lack of high-grade, high-quality ilmenite deposits as well as good rutile deposits. Particular focus has been given to rutilebearing eclogites in the Sunnfjord region of western Norway, due to a combination of factors such as high rutile content over significant volumes of rock and favourable rutile grainsize. Eclogites in the Sunnfjord region are found in a number of elongated lenses up to 3-4 km long, surrounded by gneisses of amphibolitic to granite composition, as well as numerous smaller eclogite bodies and eclogitised mafic layers in gneisses. The eclogites originated by high-pressure and temperature alteration of Proterozoic, Fe-Ti rich, gabbroic rocks, and were strongly deformed under eclogite-facies netamorphism and thereafter variably affected by retrograde processes. Eclogites in which conversation of ilmenite to rutle was complete and in which this mineral assemblage was negligibly affected by subsequent retrograde processes, are those of greatest economic potential. An example of such an eclogite is the Engebøfjellet eclogite on the north side of Førdefjord, Naustdal commune.

Korneliussen, A.; Gautneb, H.; Raaness, A. , 2008
Characterisation of garnet, Engebøfjellet rutile deposit
;Norges geologiske undersøkelse;RAPPORT;NGU-rapport; No.2008.082;203 s. pages
Abstract:
This report provides documentation of the Engebøfjellet eclogite and of the characteristics of garnet within it, including quantitative data on the chemical composition of the garnet, the amounts of garnet present and its grain-size distribution. Based on image processing of thin-sections of rutile-ore-type eclogite, the garnet content generally varies from 25 to 40 wt.%, with an estimated average of 33 wt.%. In representative rutile-ore-type eclogite the garnet grain-size is commonly in the range 100 to 250 microns (0.1-0.25 mm) and smaller, but larger garnet grains in the range 300-400 microns seem to occur fairly frequently. Inclusions of other minerals in garnet are common, but the amounts of inclusions in representative "normal size" (less than 250 microns) garnet are generally regarded as low, although precise quantitative data is not available. In general, the amount of inclusions increases with garnet grain-size and may be considerable in the larger garnets. Based on this information it is believed that high-quality garnet concentrates with garnet grain-size in the range 100 to 300 microns, could be produced from representative rutile-ore-type eclogite. The documentation provided and the knowledge behind it represent highly relevant back-ground information for continued mineral processing trials in order to test the possibilities for making garnet concentrates of sufficient quality for various applications.

Korneliussen, A.; Wanvik, J. E.; Broekmans, M. A. T. M. , 2008
Engebøfjellet: prospect of a major rutile deposit
;Norges geologiske undersøkelse;FAGRAPPORT;NGU-rapport; No.2007.055;19 s. pages
Abstract:
Engebøfjellet is a large rutile deposit within eclogite rock on the northern side of Førdefjord in Naustdal municipality, Sogn og Fjordane county, West Norway. The deposit comprises minimum 300 Mt (million metric tons) of eclogite rock containing 2.5-5 wt% rutile (TiO2, titanium oxide). With an estimated average grade of 3,8 wt% rutile the entire ore deposit contains 11.4 Mt rutile. With a current rutile proce at 675 USD per tonne, the total in-situ value amounts to 8.6 billion USD. With conventional mineral separation processing with 50% recovery, the recoverable rutile represents a value of 4.3 billion USD. Improved mineral processing using novel techniques allows for significantly higher value, perhaps up to 7.0 billion USD. It is likely that adjacent areas north of Førdefjord, particularly eastwards from Engebøfjellet towards Naustdal including the known Steinkrossen deposit, contain additional large amounts of rutile-rich eclogite, similar to Engebøfjellet. Thus, potential additional rutile resources on the north side of Førdefjorden are very significant. In case of rutile extraction with 50% rutile recovery, roughly 98% of the ore comprises mine waste with main silicate constituents garnet, pyroxene, amphibole, etc. The mine waste can safely be deposited, for instance in the adjacent fjord at 300-400 m depth. However, both the bulk availability and the mineral composition of the waste material provide a major opportunity for the development of by-products, increasing value production while at the same time decreaseing the environmental burden.

Korneliussen, A. , 2008
Rutile ore characteristics, Engebøfjellet.
;Norges geologiske undersøkelse;RAPPORT;NGU-rapport; No.2008.085;74 s. pages
Abstract:
During the DuPont/Conoco/NGU Engebøfjellet project (1995-97) 49 boreholes were drilled, altogether 14527 meters. All cores were analysed forTiO2 and Fe2O3 using a portable XRF instrument (Dutokumpu X-Met); approximately 50.000 X-Met analyses were made. A number of core sections, for most of the drill hoies one 10m-section per 100 m core, were also analysed in the laboratory by a combined XRF and ICP-AES "rutile analytical procedure" in which rutil was determined as the difference between TiO2 (total,analysed by XRF) and Ti O2 (acidsoluble, analysed by ICP-AES), giving precise information about total whole-rock TiO2 and other major elements, and semi-quantitative information of the amount of rutile present. The X-Met (XRF) core analyses in combination with surface analyses were the basis for a 3D-model ore resource developed by DuPont. Evaluation of the analytical data from the DuPont-project confirms that the core analyses carried out by the X-Met portableXRF are semi-quantitative. Adjusted X-Met data based on comparison with reference XRF analyses, give a correct overall picture of the TiO2-distribution along the cores as well as providing reliable average numbers for large coresections, but they are not reliable on meter-scale and are only indicative on 10-meter scale.

Braathen, Alvar; Erambert, Muriel , 2014
Structural and metamorphic history of the Engebøfjellet Eclogite and the exhumation of the Western Gneiss Region, Norway
;Geological Society of Norway;ARTIKKEL;Norwegian journal of geology; No.94 (1);53-76 pages
Abstract:
Crustal-scale extensional denudation and exhumation of crustal roots in mountain belts have a complex evolution, as can be documented for the Engebofiellet Eclogite of the Western Gneiss Region, Norway. This eclogite is situated in a large antiform below the major extensional Nordfiord-Sogn Detachment, with an unroofing history attesting to six events; (Phases D1-2) complete HP eclogitisation of a gabbroic complex during vertical shortening and horizontal E-W stretching. (D3-4) Retrogression along amphibolite- and greenschist-facies structures signifying highly ductile top-W shear. (D5-6) Following folding, earlier structures were cut during top-W shear on the Nordfiord-Sogn Detachment, prior to renewed regional E-W folding. The P-T path points to rapid near-isothermal decompression from c. 17 to 7 kbar (D-1 to D-4), followed by a period of cooling from 525 degrees C to 300 degrees C (brittle conditions; D-5 and D-6) during a pressure decrease of 3-4 kbar. During extension, exhumation of the crust within a growing major antiform parallel to tectonic transport was caused by either (i) repeated locking and unlocking of extensional detachment(s) that alternated with folding from transpression-transtension events on the major More-Trondelag Fault Complex, or (ii) progressive folding interacting with extensional shear zones along crustal boundary layers.

References not to be found in NGU's Reference Archive.:
Kleppe, S. 2013: The Engebøfjellet Eclogite, Sunnfjord. Petrology and modal analysis of a world class rutile-ore deposit.Master Thesis in Geosciences. University of Oslo. 151 p.

Fieldsamples
Sample No. Sample type Miscellanrous
10/120-125 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
10/145-150 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
102/10-20 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
102/120-130 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
102/180-190 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
102/250-260 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
10/240-245 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
10/290-295 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
103/110-120 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
103/220-230 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
103/360-370 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
103/50-60 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
104/200-210 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
104/330-340 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
104/90-100 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
107/190-200 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
107/50-60 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
108/130-140 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
108/200-210 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
108/340-350 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
108/50-60 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
109/140-150 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
109/200-210 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
110/110-120 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
1/101-103 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
110/170-180 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
110/290-300 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
111/200-210 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
111/330-340 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
11/140-150 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
111/60-70 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
11/200-210 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
112/180-190 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
112/260-270 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
112/360-370 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
1/126-127 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
113/170-180 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
113/240-250 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
114/100-110 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
1/160-196B Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
1/20-60B Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
12/270-280 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
12/370-380 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
13/100-105 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
13/130-140 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
13/150-160 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
13/180-181 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
13/182-183 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
13/190-200 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
13/230-240 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
13/257-258 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
13/259.1-260 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
1/65-66 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eklogitt
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
202/180-190 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
202/20-30 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
202/70-80 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
203/170-180 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
203/20-30 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
204/10-20 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
204/130-140 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
207/110-120 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
207/130-140 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
207/60-70 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
208/130-140 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
208/270-280 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
208/50-60 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
209/150-160 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
209/90-100 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
210/100-110 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
210/240-250 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
210/340-350 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
211/130-140 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
211/210-220 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
211/310-320 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
211/410-420 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eklogitt
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
2/115-116 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
212/170-180 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
212/270-280 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
212/70-80 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
213/130-140 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
213/210-220 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
213/40-50 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
214/200-210 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
214/310-320 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eklogitt
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
214/40-50 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
2/150-155 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
2/165-170 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
2/200-205 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.01 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.02 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.03 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.04 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.05 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.06 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.07 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.08 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.09 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.1 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.11 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.12 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.13 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.14 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.15 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.16 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.17 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.18 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.19 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.2 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.22 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.23 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.24 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.25 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.26 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.27 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.28 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.29 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.3 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.31 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.32 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.33 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.34 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.35 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.36 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.37 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.38 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.39 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.4 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.41 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.42 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.43 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.44 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.45 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.46 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.47 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.48 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.49 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.5 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
262.51 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
2/95-105 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
301/100-110 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eklogitt
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
301/190-200 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eklogitt
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
301/40-50 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eklogitt
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
302/190-200 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eklogitt
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
302/30-40 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eklogitt
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
302/330-340 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
303/140-150 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
303/230-240 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
303/40-50 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
303/90-100 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
304/200-210 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
304/330-340 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
304/80-90 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
3/110-111 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
3/135-136 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eklogitt
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
3/15-20 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
3/159-160 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eklogitt
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
3/60-65 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eklogitt
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
4/106-108 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
4/120-121 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
4/130-131 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
4/151-152 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
4/36-40 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
4/75-77 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
4/97-98 Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
9/(350-355) Core
Sampler: Are Korneliussen/...Stored: Løkken
Comment: Eclogite
No. of registrated element analyses = 1
No. of registrated oxide analyses = 1
NB! All analyse values are shown at the end of the printout.:

The fact sheet was created on 24.04.2024
Copyright © 2024 Geological Survey of Norway